In 1950 Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky published his book Worlds in Collision and set off a worldwide controversy in scientific and intellectual circles. Not only did his ideas about the solar system raise serious issues concerning how the latter had been formed, but they called into question the very processes by which scientific truth was to be established. The scientific establishment rose up in arms against Velikovsky’s claims about how our solar system had been formed and even sparked a serious debate about how scientific truth is to be determined.
The central claim of Velikovsky’s book is that between the 15th and 8th centuries BCE the earth experienced a series of violent catastrophes. Parts of the surface were heated to such a degree that they became molten and great streams of lava welled out, the sea boiled and largely evaporated, some mountain ranges collapsed while others rose up, continents were raised causing great floods, and a pall of darkness shrouded the earth, followed by huge fires. Moreover, Velikovsky claimed that these events had been recorded in the literature of the ancient cultures of the Hebrews, the Hindus, and the Greeks.
Moreover, Velikovsky claimed that numerous collisions between planets had occurred in the recorded history of humanity. Further, he claimed that the paths of many comets flew around in our solar system with one of them colliding with Mars, losing its tail and becoming the planet Venus. Thus, Mars shifted its course and nearly collided with earth, causing the latter to shift its orbit and our moon to completely change its orbit as well. Perhaps the most astounding claim made by Velikovsky was that many if not most of these catastrophes took place within the centuries of recorded history and were documented by ancient scholars of Egypt, Greece, Mesopotamia and detailed as well by the events of the Old Testament.
Needless to say, the scientific and scholarly worlds were scandalized by these claims. Nonetheless, several of Velikovsky’s cosmological claims were later substantiated by modern astronomical physics. For example, scientists had always claimed that Venus is a cold planet, but when they finally were able to check its temperature, it turned out to be extremely hot, thus corroborating Velikovsky’s
Idea that it had been formed recently. There proved to be many more such solid verifications of Velikovsky’s theories.
Nevertheless, the scientific community continued to attack his views, basically ostracizing both him and his books. Lawsuits were threatened and even some attempts to silence him completely were put into practice. The entire drama of Velikovsky’s attempt to contravene much of modern astronomical theory and the efforts of the scientific community to ban him and his ideas is documented in a book by Alfred DeGrazia titled The Velikovsky Affair. Velikovsky continued his battle seeking to get a fair hearing from the scientific community for his main book titled Worlds in Collision. There is another book by Velikovsky titled Ages of Chaos in which he traces out the historical implications of his cosmic theory. He consistently sought to exonerate himself to the established scientific community, but never really accomplished this task.
While I was studying at Duke University in 1965 the university invited Dr. Velikovsky to speak and explain his main ideas. The two main things I remember from his talk were (1) the fact that several of his key predictions he had made about both astronomical and geological had been corroborated, and (2) the genuine humility he showed in sharing his ideas with the audience in spite of the negative treatment he had received nationwide from the so-called “scientific” community.
It will be interesting, indeed exciting, to see if the new Webb Telescope turns up any information that might bear on the Velikovsky affair. Both the astrophysical and the socio-political dimensions of this issue will be worth tracking. To adapt from Hamlet’s remarks to Horatio: “There is more to be known about the so-called “facts” than that contained in our various theories.”
-
2 responses to “Velikovsky’s “Worlds in Collision””
-
Although I like to think myself open-minded, without Popper’s revealing critique of normal science (and the method-bashing in his extended discussion of Galileo), I’m afraid I’d assume Velikovsky didn’t deserve much consideration. Instead, I too look forward to what the Webb Scope might reveal: With less certainties, interest abounds everywhere!
-
Although I like to think myself open-minded, without Feyerabend’s revealing critique of normal science (and monolithic method-bashing in his extended discussion of Galileo), I’m afraid I’d assume Velikovsky didn’t deserve much consideration. Instead, I too look forward to what the Webb Scope might reveal: With less certainties, interest abounds everywhere!
-
-
As many of you know the decathlon is an Olympic track and field event in the modern Olympic Games but over the years was dropped from the list of events. Then, 1948 it was reinstated as an official Olympic event. A young high school athlete named Bob Mathias from Tulare, California won the event for the USA in London that year. The events are 100 meters, long jump, high jump, 400 meters, shot put, discus, pole vault, high jump, 120 meters high hurdles, and javelin. There is an official scorebook for this two-day event for granting points for each individual’s best in these 10 events.
As an all-around high school track and field athlete I had very much-admired Bob Mathias’ achievement and really wanted to give the event a try. At 5’10 and 150 pounds (then😊) I was far too small to ever do well in the event, but I dreamed of competing in it. In 1954 I was in college in Southern California, the mecca of track and field champions, and my coach found out there was to be a decathlon event in Pasadena soon and asked me if I wanted to give it a try. I did, and so I finally got to compete in a decathlon.
There were about 20 of us, and I was by far the smallest. There were also several worldclass athletes who were entered: The Reverend Bob Richards, world record holder in the pole vault, Fortune Gourdine, the world record holder with the discus, and my friend Sam Adams from the University of California, a truly great all-around athlete. The rules state that if a contestant breaks a world record in their specialty and they have competed in at least five of the events, the world record stands. Both Richards and Gourdine hoped to do just that. Neither did.
Sam Adams had tried to help me get ready for the competition, and although he helped me a great deal with the weights, when it came to the pole vault, I was pretty hopeless. I did OK in the running events and the long jump, my specialty. I knew how to put the shot and throw the discus, so it went OK with them. Not so much with the javelin. Much to my surprise I did my lifetime best in the high jump at 5’9 and 3/4. When all was said and done, I finished 11th out of 20 competitors.
Bob Richards won the decathlon, pole vaulting well over 15 feet. Gourdine won the discus but did not break a world record. Sam Adams came in a close second overall. All in all, it was a fantastic thing for me just to compete in this event, and especially with so many great athletes. Later that year Sam finished fourth in the Olympic trials and so did not quite make the Olympic team.
That was pretty much the conclusion of my track and field career. I avoided killing myself in the pole vault, even though I came down on my head in the sawdust pit several times. I vaulted a dismal 9 feet. I am so glad I finally got to compete in a decathlon even though I was disappointed that I did not do so well. However, that experience greatly contributed to my being a better college and high school track and field coach several years later. I knew a lot more about most of the events because I had actually competed in them.Leave a Reply
5 responses to “THE DECATHLON AND ME”
-
Point very well made, Jerry, and reinforced effectively by your actual experience in the competition.
-
Thanks Roo – glad you are reading these things :O) Love, jerry
-
-
Experts tell us that great athletes possess a specially developed kinetic sense that most people lack. Combined with other physical gifts, their greatness is founded on good genetics. Try as we may, we plebes with more normal physical configurations just can’t keep up. We couldn’t keep up with Einstein or Teresa of Avila either. So we do the best we can with what we’ve got. And sometimes miracles happen.
-
Makes sense to me – and i think the special sense comes in degrees – some of us have more (and LESS) of it than others :O) Clearly the blokes mentioned above had more :O) Paz, jerry
-
-
Love this story! 11 out of 20 is pretty good in my book. Love all these posts! Keep ‘em coming! One of these days include a photo of the author.
-
Leave a Reply