As many of you know, the Dead Sea Biblical scrolls were discovered back in the early part of this century. They were found in several caves on the hillside above the Dead Sea itself, placed in large earthen jars. They seem to have been hidden in these caves sometime during the First Century CE in order to keep them from being discovered by the Roman occupying soldiers.
It took many years and a certain amount of intrigue for the scrolls to find their way into the hands of Biblical scholars who could preserve and translate them. Indeed, they have been under constant scrutiny all through the past fifty odd years they have been in the hands of scholars. Most of the scrolls are of the Old Testament biblical books familiar to Western cultures, while others pertain to the Qumran religious community near where and by whom they were hidden.
The people founding this community had separated themselves from the Jewish nation as such which they believed had departed from the true nation of Israel under the Roman occupation. They were in the desert awaiting the arrival of God’s new and true reign to come from heaven. It is thought by some scholars that John the Baptist, or even Jesus himself, may have had some connection with this community. The scrolls were in extremely fragmented condition when found.
I have two points of special interest to share with you about this special place. One is simply the fact that I had the opportunity to visit this area back in 1966, and to actually crawl into one of the caves in which the scrolls had found. It was a truly amazing experience to climb up to the caves and to actually crawl inside one of them. I was spending a week in Jerusalem and an American scholar studying there (Dr. James Robinson) volunteered to take me to the ruins/caves.
When the Romans came after the original Qumran community to destroy it, many of its members, along with some of the Traditional Jewish people from Jerusalem seemed to have committed suicide by jumping off the cliff. The ruined buildings and various water pools have stood there in the desert ever since. It is a very rocky, arid, and deserted area where no one tries to live or farm anymore. It stands right beside the Dead Sea itself, in which there is no form of life.
The second point of interest I can share with you concerns the translation of the Dead Sea scrolls themselves. First, some background. An Oxford scholar named Strugnell, who was teaching at Duke while I was there, had initially been given the responsibility to oversee the compilation of the scrolls into a single text. Unfortunately, and for reasons not fully understood, the project of producing an actual text never seems to have gotten off the ground. He and his team simply never were able, or chose not, to produce a usable copy of the Dead Sea scrolls.
Now, here is where things get interesting. As I understand it Professor Strugnell was only able to put together an analytic concordance of all the terms used in the scrolls, but no actually translation as of yet. The concordance documented every word used in the scrolls according to exactly where they appeared, allowing copies to be printed. I do believe that the Professor was eventually found derelict in his duties and was removed from his position.
However, as I understand it, two scholarly Catholic priests reasoned that since they had a complete concordance of the manuscripts, they could feed the information about where each word appeared, chapter and verse, into a computer and have the computer collate all the material, each instance of each word, and print out the Dead Sea Scrolls themselves, sort of “in reverse.” And so they did! They were in this way able to bypass Professor Strugnell’s assignment and produce the actual Dead Sea Scrolls themselves.
-
2 responses to “THE QUMRAN CAVES AND SCROLLS”
-
My friend Jim Tabor has done a lot of work on these scrolls. The Diatessoron is most interesting, because they show how first century Christians actually worshiped, including the actual words used in communion (quite different from Paul’s words in 1 Cor.). Many of the works pertaining to Christian life are gospels thought to be uninstructive for Christians, since they are written under the influence of nonChristian philosophies such as Gnosticism. But they do often contain older versions of some of the sources used by the New Testament writers (the “Q” source). Some of these older versions are more original, since later versions are generally thought to be edited in the face of later circumstances. A good example is that “Q” has the disciples coming to Jesus to ask him to teach them John’s (the baptist) prayer, which he used liturgically in his baptisms. The prayer Jesus gives them is now commonly known as “the Lord’s Prayer”, and in the gospels the disciples ask Jesus simply to “teach us to pray”. John, of course, was returning repentent Jews back to a heart-felt practice of Judaism, not converting Jews to Christianity, which did not exist at that time. A close analysis of the “Lord’s” prayer reveals it to be a Jewish document and quite distant from the grace-centered theology of Paul (forgive me my sins, because I have forgiven everyone who has sinned against me does not accord with God forgiving all who believe in Jesus, a forgiveness given by pure grace). Pope Francis has complained that he does not think God leads us into temptation, a view that Jews of Jesus’ day held. Moreover, while many hoped that the scrolls would give us a kind of official and original text of the Old Testament, it turns out that all were found to be versions, all different in places from the other versions. So it’s turtles all the way down.
-
Wow, thanks so much David for filling in more details about the scrolls. I did not know that the “teach us to pray” led to “The Lord’s Prayer” in Q. I go with Q all the way, the Jesus of the Sermon on the Mount says all I need to know :O) – and I did meet Strugnell briefly at Duke – funny old (and alcoholic) dude. Thanks so much for your continued input in these blogs :O) Paz, jerry
-
-
-
In Chapter 21 of the Book of Genesis we are told how the division between Jews and Arabs (later Muslims) came about. Hang tough for this is a complex story. Because he and his wife Sarah had waited unsuccessfully for a child, Abraham had taken a slave wife in order to have a son. He chose Hagar and they had a son Ishmael. God looked after them.
Then when his wife Sarah gave birth to Isaac, Abraham wanted to send Hagar and Ishmael away, but God spoke to him saying that he would make two great nations from these sons of Abraham (Genesis 21:13). “I will make a great nation of the slave girl’s son too, because he is your child as well”. So, Abraham sent Hagar and Ishmael on their way and God directed them through the wilderness of Beersheba to that of Paran, just North of the Sinai peninsula. Ishmael became an archer and married a woman from Egypt. As time went bye Ishmael’s people came to dwell in the Arabian desert East of Egypt.
So, as it happened, Abraham’s son Ishmael became the progenitor of the Arabian people, who eventually embraced Islam as their religion. Now, fast forward to the early chapters of Exodus where we find that after his escape from Egypt, on the run for having killed an Egyptian, Moses had married Zipporah the daughter of one Jethro, a Median priest. Jethro soon became Moses’ right-hand man in sorting out the socio-political complexities of leading thousands of people out of Egypt toward the promised land. (Exodus 18: 1-27).
As it turns out, these Midian people are the descendants of Ishmael, and thus Moses was now married to a woman who was a descendent of Ishmael. Thus the nations of the two sons of Abraham have actually been united. In fact, Zipporah, Moses’ wife actually circumcised Moses’ son and Jethro became Moses’ father-in-law. One can now see the close relationship these two nations, and eventually, these two religions, have in common.
So when we come to modern times it is a shame to see what a difficult time these two peoples have had understanding one another. Indeed, actually, the Muslims accept the Hebrew scriptures, the Christian “Old Testament”, as authoritative to some degree as their own Quran. In a sense, then, the Jewish religion is the forerunner of Islam. Yet today these two faiths are constantly at war.
I myself find much of the Islamic faith weak and misleading, but I do think it is important for people of every faith to find ways to come together and work toward greater mutual understanding and respect. At the same time, it does not seem realistic to hope for this. I have tried honestly to read and understand the Quran but must admit that much if not most of it seems shallow and dogmatic, as of course does much of both the Jewish and Christian scriptures.
Nonetheless, I do believe that it is important for all of us to recognize and respect the faith of other people, as hard as this may be to do.Leave a Reply
One response to “THE ORIGIN OF THE JEWISH-ISLAMIC DIVISION”
-
During my latest visit to Crete, I learned that most of the people in the western end of the island converted to Islam during the 400 years of Turkish occupation. While there are many who would say this occupation period was oppressive and unjust, I don’t think so many would point to the religious conversion as particularly problematic. Indeed, friends there are very open about oppressive aspects of Christian Orthodoxy. But I also heard people there say all this insistence on some inherent conflict between Christians and Muslims has to stop, that it’s primarily created by politicians and religious leaders seeking power and weapons dealers seeking profits. My taxi driver to the airport from Piraeus said the Greeks need to stop following the agendas of the northern Europeans so much and focus more on making peace and prosperity with their more immediate geographical neighbors.
-
Leave a Reply