In a theological context this question is considered to be the heart of the Christian message. What did Jesus mean when he asked while on the cross: “My God, why have you forsaken me?” Much later on Saint Anselm asked the question in his famous book: “Cur Deus Homo?” (Why did God become human?”) The first traditional explanation is that God had seen to it that Jesus died as a sacrifice to pay for the sins of humanity, from Adam and Eve all the way to the here and now, including you and me. This is what the Christian church, especially theologically “born again” conservative Christians, teaches.
Theologically this is called the “Penal satisfaction” theory of the Atonement, when Jesus atoned for our sins. Bluntly it teaches that since we are all sinners someone must pay for our sinfulness with a death. Thus, God sent his only Son Jesus to die and make this payment. Two related questions most often get overlooked here. One, to whom is the payment made? Who demands this payment? It seems that it must be God himself, although some early thinkers suggested that the payment was made to Satan, but why would God have to pay off Satan?
The remaining, key, question is: why would God himself require the death of His only son? Why would this satisfy or please him? What goes unanswered is the question: How did this whole issue of payment ever come up? Why Does God require a sacrifice at all? What kind of God are we dealing with here? It would seem to be some sort of pagan notion of Divinity that is driving this theory. In Jesus’ own words:” My God, (my own Father) why have you forsaken me (your own Son?)”
In modern times some Christian theologians have suggested that God sent Jesus to die in order to provide an example of the Divine love, to show what extremes God will go to in order to save humankind. This has been called liberal “Moral Influence” theory of the atonement. But it still remains that God seems to be killing his own Son in order to impress humanity. It’s almost as if God is “Showing off”.
Biblical scholars have pointed out that when he asked, “My God, why have you forsaken me?” Jesus was actually quoting the first verse of Psalm 22, something traditional Jews often did at the time of their death. Moreover, the Psalm goes on to declare that God has not, in fact, forsaken them, but everything depends on which preposition is used. By and large the preposition used in the New Testament is that of uper meaning “on behalf of”, not, anti “instead of”. Thus, Jesus died on our behalf not instead of us. His death was not a substitute for ours, but a signal to humanity of God’s great love for us. Neither we nor God have to pay anything to anyone. “God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself.”
There are two important books to read if one is interested in pursuing this issue further. The classic background volume is God Was In Christ by Donald Bailie. Bailie argues that the key verse here is the one that states that “God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself.” God sought to bring us back to himself , not payoff some ambiguous debt to Satan, let alone to himself. The book which best presents what I take to be the best approach is Christus Victor by Gustaf Aulen. The latter explains more fully how Jesus’ death should be understood, not as a payment to God on our behalf, but as an act of God which shows the extreme character and depth of God’s love for humanity to free us from our selfishness.
-
3 responses to “WHY DID JESUS DIE ON THE CROSS?”
-
It’s difficult for me to understand atonement, and your question “why would God himself require the death of His only son?” is compelling. It doesn’t make
sense to me, and the only out is the idea that God’s logic is not human logic which isn’t very satisfying.Your essay title reminded me of my past interest in the Jesus Seminar.
Crossan suggested the historical event followed from Pilate’s worries about
Jesus riding into Jerusalem like King David, especially during Passover when
the city was crowded. In his view the perpetrators were all Roman, not Jewish, hence no reason for the crucifixion to inspire antisemitism. Crossan
was provocative, but I wish there was more direct evidence.-
Hey again Chuck – you focus the best issues :O) I think we have to disengage the story from its post-factor theological ruminations. He was a deep and great teacher who got caught up in the Roman thing and died as a result but inspired his followers to live out his teachings and example. He didn’t die for anyone, just showed us how to live and die. His acceptance of his cruel fate embodied the love of God (no enemies. etc.) No one needed to be “paid off”. The Jews had developed their own “sacrificial” theology and the Romans had their fish in the fire. Jesus brought a new way of living and dying – for others
-
-
Very interesting, Jerry! Nietzsche focuses on this issue as a paradox which shows how absurd Christianity is. I must admit that I think it does seem illogical for God to die or for him to sacrifice “his son” to repay a debt. Just one of those absurdities which I think betrays Christianity as a position that is undesirable for a philosophically minded person to take.
-
-
In the 1920s oil was discovered in the ground beneath the land owned by individual Native Americans in Oklahoma. One by one various of the owners began to die off under suspicious circumstances. Several Native American women of the Osage Tribe who had been married by local white men were murdered – actually shot or poisoned – in order to inherit their land and all the rights to the oil underneath. These men became millionaires overnight.
Initially the members of the Osage tribe registered their land and when it became clear that they all were sitting on an oil “Gold Mine” they all became millionaires overnight, even though it took several years for the oil profits to materialize. In 1923 alone the tribe took in more than 30 million dollars, equivalent today of over 400 million. Many travelled around the world, built fancy mansions, and went to the best schools in Europe. But that’s when the systematic murders began.
It took the newly formed FBI and numerous private investigators years to uncover the whole plot and prosecute and convict the men who had stolen the rights to the oil riches from their wives by first marrying them and then killing them. These men, led by Ernest Burkhart, got away with this plot for many years before they were brought to justice, partly by the efforts of the FBI and mostly by those of several private detectives who had been hired by various Native Americans. There were numerous trials all around the state of Oklahoma.
Slowly the devious plot began to be uncovered and the guilty persons tracked down. Bye then many of the original swindlers and murderers had already died. A great deal of the credit eventually must go to author David Gramm for his continued sleuthing, as well as for his bringing this volume together. The book’s title is Killers of the Flower Moon. It seems impossible to believe that a plot so treacherous and evil could have been born, but in this book the author has dotted all the “i’s” and crossed all the “t’s”.
Ironically, the U.S. government has recently allowed electric companies to erect windmills all over the reservation land because they “do not impede or trespass’ on any Native American source of livelihood. Besides, oil as a means of power is hopefully fast receding into the sunset, leaving the Native Americans with their land and whatever oil rights they can peddle. Like the Cherokee “Trail of Tears” this white man bamboozle also has left Native Americans out in the cold.
I write about this book and its fiendish plot because I have for a long time been interested in and saddened by the plight of Native Americans ever since the coming of the “White Man.” We have taken their land, pushed them around, even eliminated them by the thousands, all in the name of “Manifest Destiny” and “progress.” In spite of this, thousands of native Americans have helped us fight our World Wars and continue to contribute to the enrichment of our cultural life.
“Killers of the Flower Moon” will also be a film available soon in theaters.Leave a Reply
3 responses to “KILLERS OF THE FLOWER MOON”
-
Killers of the Flower Moon is a great book. David Grann’s latest, The Wager, quickly topped the best seller list, but it inspired so much interest in the 2016 book, that Flower Moon briefly had the number one spot, and was ahead
of The Wager in yesterday’s Times list. One of my book clubs chose Flower Moon for next year’s read.Yesterday’s number one was a 700+ page Oppenheimer biography. Movies have the power to sell books. We’ll see the movie today with an historian, philosopher, and scientist. That should produce good dinner conversation.
-
Great news Chuck :O) I did not know that the movie is already out. Must see. Best. Jerry
-
-
What. Is. Wrong. With. “Us”?!
(↑
More a statement than a question, of course.)You’ve re-stoked it again, Jer: We rarely see films, but we’re going to see this one…
Hope you guys are staying cool enough!
♥️B&N
-
Leave a Reply